In the conditions of the crisis, the state
authorities are developing protectionist measures to amend statutory regulation
in the area of state and municipal procurement and of procurement by specific
types of legal entities, with a view to targeting the customers’ activity in
carrying out the procurement of mostly domestic products on a permanent basis.
The Russian
Government has submitted to the State Duma two draft laws:
- draft federal law No. 969960-7 “On amending the Federal Law 'On
the contractual system for the procurement of goods, work and services to meet
federal and municipal needs'” (“Draft Law to 44-FZ”);
- draft federal law No. 970027-7 “On amending article 3 of the
Federal Law 'On the procurement of goods, work and services by specific types
of legal entities’” (“Draft Law to 223-FZ”).
We advise
of the key new developments and implications for the market in the event the
draft laws are adopted.
The changes in the powers of the Russian
Government: with respect to establishing quotas for procurement
With a view
to ensuring national security, the Russian Government determines in the overall
annual procurement volume a minimum share of the procurement of goods
manufactured in the Eurasian Economic Union (the “EAEU”) to be carried out by
state and municipal purchasers of goods (work, services) as well as by legal
entities. The list of goods (work, services) to which the provision regarding
the assignment of quotas will apply will also be approved by the Russian
Government.
Draft
statutory provisions on the procedure for assigning quotas for the procurement
of Russian goods are being developed. The resolutions being drafted take into
account the capabilities of Russian industry and the specifics of each sector.
According to the representatives of the Russian Ministry of Economic
Development, sector-specific quotas should not entail an overstatement of prices and supplies of
inferior goods.
According
to the relevant representatives, it is further proposed to set a mandatory share for the
procurement of
high-technology goods, including radio-electronic products, software as well as
engineering and healthcare products, since stimulating the specified sectors
increases the technological stability of the entire economy.
The
provisions of the Draft Laws are aimed at supporting the Russian producers of
goods, including as part of the diversification of military and industrial
enterprises, in terms of stimulating the manufacturing of high-technology civil
products.
The
amendments to Laws No. 44-FZ and No. 223-FZ in a similar way provide for the
powers of the Russian Government to determine:
- the
requirements for the contents and form of the report on the customer’s
compliance with the minimum share of procurement and the procedure for drawing
up and placing the report in the unified informational system (the “UIS”);
- the
requirements for the contents of the substantiation that the customer is unable
to comply with the minimum share of procurement and the procedure for drawing
up and placing the substantiation in the UIS;
- a competent
federal executive body carrying out an assessment of the customer’s compliance
with the minimum share of procurement.
In
addition, the Draft Law to Law No. 44-FZ includes in the list of the Russian
Government’s powers the ability to determine:
- the
procedure for using the UIS with a view to assessing the compliance of state
and municipal customers with the minimum share of procurement;
- the cases
and the consequences of, as well as the procedure for, an assessment being
carried out of the customer’s compliance with the minimum share of procurement,
and the indicators to assess whether the customer has achieved the minimum
share of procurement.
The procedure for and the specifics of carrying
out procurement with a view to the customer achieving the minimum share of
procurement
The Draft
Law to Law No. 44-FZ established the procedure for the state and municipal
customers to comply with the minimum share of procurement and the specifics of
determining the initial (maximum) contract price, the price of a contract
concluded with a single supplier (contractor, service provider), the initial
price of an item of goods, work or a service based on the specified
characteristics of the goods produced in a EAEU member state.
The same
Draft Law introduces an article regarding the specifics of carrying out
procurement for the customer to achieve the minimum share of procurement. With
a view to performing the obligation to carry out the procurement of goods
taking into account the relevant requirements of the Russian Government, the
customer:
- sets a
limit with regard to goods (work, services) and foreign states (except for the
EAEU member states) in a notice of procurement, in the procurement
documentation and in an invitation to take part in determining a supplier (a
contractor, service provider) under a closed procedure;
- sets out in
a contract the supplier’s obligation to supply goods (work, services) produced
in an EAEU member state, provided that procurement is carried out from a single
supplier (a contractor, service provider) in accordance with the cases set out
in article 93(1) of Law No. 44-FZ.
If no
procurement application with goods (work, services) from EAEU member states is
submitted, the customer will have to recognise that the procurement has failed
and, if needed, amend the project schedule and either select the supplier once
again, or carry out another procurement procedure.
A
procurement of foreign goods and services will only be allowed if, following
the extension of the deadline for filing procurement applications, once more no
applications with Russian goods and services are submitted.
At the end
of the year the customer should prepare a report on the volume of goods procured
and place such report in the UIS before 1 April of the year following the
reporting year. If, at the end of the year, the volume of goods (work,
services) procured from EAEU member states is not in line with the minimum
share of procurement, the customer must place in the UIS a substantiation that
the customer is unable to achieve the minimum share of procurement.
Therefore,
the customer will have to annually comply with the minimum share of procurement
established for it. If the customer fails to comply with this requirement, it will have to report the reasons for this.
The
proposed amendments will extend the procurement procedure and complicate the
procurement of goods manufactured abroad. Both Russian and foreign market
participants should take this into account when planning their activity in
Russia.
What to think about and what to do
We
recommend that companies should:
1. Follow up on the measures being taken by the government and the
changing regulations to remain good faith participants of the market.
2. In order to avoid violations of antitrust legislation, take
account of the potential changes in the regulation when participating in
procurement procedures, including when making purchases from a single supplier.
3. Assess the commercial decisions of the company relating to the
customer achieving the minimum procurement volume in terms of their being
economically justified and compliant with antimonopoly legislation.
4. Pay special attention to how they build commercial relationships
with Russian and foreign suppliers when carrying out procurement.
5. Consider taking other measures aimed at reducing risks of
antimonopoly violations.
Pepeliaev
Group’s antimonopoly practice